from    
to    
search  

 


AIR学术沙龙第36期|人工智能医疗保健和虚拟世界的可穿戴传感器和触觉技术
先立后破?实现双碳目标
迎接生物药制造的第四次浪潮-
支撑未来海量资源接入,电力系统通用信息模型(CIM)发展探讨
报告题目:
Limits on the Computational Power of Random Strings
 报告人:
Eric Allender
Rutgers, the State University of NJ
报告时间:
2011-09-22 14:00
报告地点:
FIT 1-222
主办单位:
交叉信息研究院
  简介:
Short Bio:

Eric Allender is a well-known researcher in the field of computational complexity, and has given numerous plenary addresses internationally at symposia on theoretical computer science. He received a B.A. from the University of Iowa in 1979, majoring in Computer Science and Theatre, and a Ph.D. from Georgia Tech in 1985.  He has been at Rutgers University since then, serving as department chair from 2006 to 2009.  He is a Fellow of the ACM, and serves on the editorial boards of ACM Transactions on Computation Theory, Computational Complexity, and The Chicago Journal of Theoretical Computer Science.  He has chaired the Conference Committee for the annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, and he serves on the Scientific Board for the Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC).

Abstract:
R, the set of Kolmogorov-random strings, is a central notion in the study of algorithmic information theory, and in recent years R has increasingly been studied in relation to computational complexity theory. This talk takes as its starting point three strange inclusions that have been proved since 2002: 1. NEXP is contained in the class of problems NP-Turing-reducible to R. 2. PSPACE is contained in the class of problems poly-time Turing-reducible to R. 3. BPP is contained in the class of problems poly-time truth-table-reducible to R. (These inclusions hold for both of the most widely-studied variants of Kolmogorov complexity: the plain complexity C(x) and the prefix-complexity K(x). They also hold no matter which "universal" Turing machine is used in the definitions of the functions C and K.)
 
These inclusions are "strange" since R is not even computable! Thus it is not at all clear that these are meaningful upper bounds on the complexity of BPP, PSPACE, and NEXP, and indeed it is not at all clear that it is very interesting to consider efficient reductions to noncomputable sets such as R.
 
In this talk, I will try to convince you that the class of problems efficiently reducible to R is, indeed, a complexity class. The main theorems are that, if we restrict attention to prefix complexity K and the corresponding set of random strings R_K, then the class of decidable problems that are in NP relative to R_K (no matter which universal machine is used to define K) lies in EXPSPACE, and the class of decidable problems that are poly-time truth-table reducible to R_K (no matter which universal machine is used to define K) lies in PSPACE.
 
Thus we can "sandwich" PSPACE between the class of problems truth-table-and Turing-reducible to R_K, and the class of decidable problems that are in NP relative to R_K lies between NEXP and EXPSPACE. The corresponding questions for plain Kolmogorov complexity C are wide open; no upper bounds are known at all for the class of decidable problems efficiently reducible to R_C.
 
These results also provide the first quantitative limits on the applicability of uniform derandomization techniques.
 
This is joint work with Luke Friedman and William Gasarch.
今日相关信息
强关联多粒子体系中的基本物理
 
同类别相关信息
密码技术前沿应用与发展趋势
Power Sensor Networks by Wireless ...
Entity Matching with Active Monoton...
关于网络计算的讨论
新移动时代的内容消费
学术活动